Arti suicide case

Section 304b dowry death of indian penal code

Once again a case under section 304b dowry death of indian penal code has been lodged when a 22 year old Aarti hanged herself from the ceiling fan and yet again accused is her husband Nitin. The deceased's father Inderpal singh claimed his daughter is murdered for dowry demand.

Arti before her death wrote a suicide note that is being under forensic examination. 

The whole incident is from Gurgaon and the investigation officer is ASI Dilbag Singh.

Now we have to see where investigation goes rationally or gender comes in to existence once again since the case is under section 304b indian penal code. which i earlier stated is the most responsible case of ipc  and should be taken care of in the same manner.

rational judgement on 304b and 498a

304B Dowry Death and 498A Dowry Demand and Cruelty

New Delhi

I praise Justice Pawan Kumar Jain for delivering a rational decision on a very sensitive, responsible and volatile issues i.e 304B Dowry Death and 498A Dowry Demand and Cruelty.  It would definitely be relief to an innocent man Mohan Lal and his parents for not being punished for what they have not done !!!! that too under section 304B and 498A of indian penal code.

According to Justice Jain prosecution has failed to prove that deceased was tortured soon before her death. Case was registered in mechanical manner by the father of the deceased. Should not concerned court take self cognizance over the false case registered by father of the deceased misguiding the court and society and defaming a socially responsible family by dragging them in to shameful case under section 304B Dowry Death and 498A Dowry Demand and Cruelty

The detailed order can be found in delhi court.

304B Dowry Death

Justice delayed is justice denied. What if justice is delayed for fifteen precious years of men's life. What if justice delay can cause a young man turned in to old man.

kamlesh weds gurudayal on 10 December 1993. Few years after marriage they had a daughter. On 7 august 1999 after a span of nearly six years, Kamlesh died unnaturally in the hospital and statement of the deceased recorded as well. Since this death took place within seven years of marriage (ironically almost six years everything was fine) and unnatural case under section 304B (Dowry Death) was constituted against Gurudayal. Session court in his judgement on 27 may 2006 found Gurudayal guilty and sentenced him to 10 years of imprisonment. Gurudayal appealed to High Court and defence argued that main constituent of Dowry Death is that, Prosecution has to prove beyond doubt that the deceased had been subjected to cruelty soon before her death. In this case prosecution failed to prove this. And Gurudayal acquitted from the charges from the high court. Justice done?

What about fifteen valuable years. Think about it.

Detailed judgement can be seen in high court site.  

another case of 304B Dowry Death

Curse of 304b dowry death

Every woman dies unnaturally within seven years of marriage is dowry death ????????????

New case has come in to news from Andhra Pradesh where a 23 years old lady commits suicide in A.P. 

Rubeena Begum from Rajendranagar committed suicide by hanging herself from the ceiling fan. Deceased was married to Abdul Basith in 2012 and couple has a one year old son, information has been lodged by the deceased family under section 304B Dowry Death under indian penal code. 

Abdul Basith and his other family members are in judicial custody. 304B Dowry Death is very responsible section of indian penal code and please take it as it is, don't make a scene of it please.I now think what state of mind people be in if they are innocent. what happens to a infant of one year of age. please think rationally. don't bias.

New Case of 304B Dowry Death

Curse of 304b dowry death

Yet another case of 304B(Dowry Death), 498A (Dowry Demand and Cruelty). Case is from Madanpura, Mohali where a 24 year old lady committed suicide by consuming poison at her house. Maninder Singh and Manpreet wedded in 2012. Manpreet committed suicide within seven years of marriage and since suicide comes under unnatural death. Therefore, a case under section 304B i.e. dowry death and 498A cruelty in connection with dowry demand is registered against Maninder Singh and others. Case is registered by father (informant) of the deceased Manpreet Kaur.

This case is under investigation. 

I once again request the concerned people to please investigate the case rationally. Please do not have any bias to any gender. Indian constitution is equal for every citizen. I request do not spare the culprit and please do the justice if accused is innocent. please.........

304B Dowry Death Causes

Curse of 304b dowry death

An innocent man can fall in to the trap of 304B, Dowry Death when his wife dies with in seven years of marriage in an unnatural way. sometimes women becomes extravagantly demanding after marriage and all the time husband remains at receiving end just to save his matrimonial life. I have come across many times of this kind of scenario. An egoist wife may turn more and more voilent  sometimes which leads her to unsound state of mind. That can result in to suicidal tendency. 

Let us look in to a statement made by honorable Justice of Apex Court, respected Justice Dhingra  

"Suicide is a known phenomenon of human nature. Suicides are committed by living human beings for various reasons, some are not able to bear the normal stresses which are common in life".

This suicide creates 304B Dowry Death in many cases and yet again an innocent man goes behind the bar leaving behind everything he owns physically, socially, economically etc.

The judgement of consideration may seen at 

Petition No.555/2003

Narender Singh Arora                           Petitioner Versus

State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.       Respondents Counsels

I once again humbly request to responsible citizens of this country  to please come forward against the misuse of 304B Dowry Death.

304B in sessions courts.

Curse of 304b dowry death

In a judgment the Apex court bench of Justice A.K. Patnaik and Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya said that prosecution has to prove, besides the demand of dowry, harassment or cruelty caused by the accused to the deceased soon before her death under section 304B i.e. dowry death.

But this gender bias law is so viral and fatal that lower judicial system of this country is not immune to this and the judges of sessions courts are not gutsy enough to pass rational judgement on this issue i.e. 304B (Dowry Death). I have come across so many judgements in which so called accused, the husband, is being victimized. I can not understand why  people of this country don't stand up against use of this law as torturing machine.

 I have quoted the judgement of the honorable judges of apex court in which they have clearly stated that it is responsibility of the prosecution to prove that deceased had been subjected to cruelty but now a days in sessions courts responsibility has been shifted to innocent accused to prove the things he has not done in 304B and 498A. How a man can prove a thing he has not done. 

I request people of this country to raise your voice to save innocent men whose life, career, social status all are at stake and jeopardized by this lethal weapon called 304B and 498A.

Delay in judicial system

Curse of 304b dowry death

Most important issue which is related to the slow judicial procedure in india. The said dowry death took place on 06.09 1989. The Trial Court pronounced its decision on 03.10.1991 after two years of Janki Devi’s death.

The first appeal happened to be decided by the High Court on 05.07.2004 which is more than 12 years later. A petition for special leave to appeal was filed in the Apex Court in 2004 and  leave was granted only after a time gap of 4 years in 2008.
Thereafter this appeal was listed for hearing in 2008 instead of a petition of 2004 thereby passing 4 years of its age in this Court. And after listing of the case it  took another 5 years for its disposal, a total of nine years spent in the Court after filing the case. This much time can easily jeopardize career, mental, physical behavior of any innocent person. So it is my sincere request to all citizen of this country to take necessary action on their part. 

Entire judgement can be read on apex court site under.

Criminal Appeal No.1022 of 2008 (Supreme Court of India)